sunset from behind the wire

sunset from behind the wire

Sunday, March 3, 2013

The First Couple to Mars

Dennis Tito (who flew as a guest astronaut on the International Space Station in 2001) was the first space tourist, spending $20 million for his trip aboard a Russian launch - and return to Earth. I'd be lying if I said that I didn't envy the heck out of his trip into Earth orbit. He made his millions the old fashioned way, by founding Wilshire Associates, a company that provides investment management, consulting and technology services.

Tito is going it one better. He's sending one couple into space on January 5, 2018 on a round-trip to Mars. They'll lift off on January 5, 2018 for a 140 million mile ride. (Fox News
The mission’s target launch date is Jan. 5, 2018. This exceptionally quick, free-return orbit opportunity occurs twice every 15 years. After 2018, the next opportunity won’t occur again until 2031. (Inspiration Mars)
Dennis Tito - The first Space Tourist
Dennis Tito said, "This is humanity's first flight out to Mars, and humanity should be represented by both genders.  We hope that we can find a married couple. When you're out that far and the Earth is a tiny blue pinpoint, you're going to need someone you can hug. What better solution to the psychological problems you're going to encounter with that isolation?" It's a 1.4 year trip to Mars and back (hopefully in one piece) and “It’s a really long road trip, you’re jammed into an RV that goes the equivalent of 32,000 times around the Earth…and they’ll have about 3,000 pounds of dehydrated food that they’ll get to rehydrate with the same water they drank two days ago,” explained Jane Poynter, a member of the project.

The mission will cost around US$1 billion but in terms of US manned space missions, it's nearly chump change, and it will be using private money. The government is not a part of this particular program. Since it's not apparently designed to make Muslims feel good about themselves, it's a departure from the general philosophy that underpins much of the modern NASA outreach under the Obama Administration. 

In the past, concerns about manned deep space travel outside of the radiation belts that protect both the Earth and the Moon have primarily revolved around having adequate shielding to keep the crew alive. Radiation from the Sun is not uniform (one of many reasons for 'climate change') and some sunspots blast very heavy directed radiation into space. 

The five year timeline to launch is quite short to design, build and test the spacecraft, which will be essentially a habitability chamber (shielded) sitting  in front of a propulsion unit that will accelerate the ship and presumably also decelerate it at the end of the 501-day long slingshot/free return mission (see below). 

Mark August 21, 2018 on your calendar because if all goes well, the date will be one for the history books as some select couple will be passing by Mars on the first manned trip to the Red Planet.

It's interesting that the first manned trip to Mars will not be a government effort, but a private one. I hope that it will go according to plan and break new ground for the future.

If you could go to Mars (irrespective of your age or educational qualifications), would you? And who would you want to make the trip with?

Thanks -- But No Thanks

Americans own nearly $20 trillion in retirement savings and the US Government, which can't borrow enough or spend enough, wants to take over control -- because they care about you.

Enter the Dodd-Frank Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)
(IBD) CFPB director and longtime Democratic politician Richard Cordray earlier this month told Bloomberg News that managing retirement savings is "one of the things we've been exploring ... in terms of whether and what authority we have." Every such new creature legislated into existence by our elected officials wastes little time before seeking to expand its power — always with the best intentions, of course. 
There always ends up being an excuse to do things the law doesn't give you any authority for, and the CFPB's Office for Older Americans being headed by another big government Democrat, Hubert H. Humphrey III, is further cause for worry. 
What business, exactly, does a U.S. government that has rung up over $16.6 trillion in red ink have giving consumers advice on how to save money?
Dear Leader loves you all.
The Obama Administration is considering a "savings tax" to generate more money that they can turn into redistributive vote buying. While I'm not surprised at anything that they do, this despicable behavior is simply the latest of what promises to be a number of salvos in the name of utopian socialism that will be fired against the American people over the next four long years.
As American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries CEO Brian H. Graff charged last week, such a cash grab "would more accurately be described as double taxation" in which "a small-business owner in the 39.6% bracket would pay an 11.6% tax on contributions made to the 401(k) plan today, and pay tax again at the full rate when they retire."
Allowing the US Government to touch retirement savings is much like allowing a raging alcoholic into a liquor store after the store has closed and everyone is gone. Except that the drunk will eventually pass out after he's swilled all that his system will handle. The US Government has no limit to the amount that it wants to spend because it's now only about buying votes and retaining power.

The same government that squandered the Social Security Trust Fund and raided everything that it could get its claws into now wants the one thing that it doesn't have. Your PRIVATE retirement funds.