sunset from behind the wire

sunset from behind the wire

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Building a Better Liar

The Obama Administration's Legacy

Some call President Obama a sociopathic narcissist. The mainstream media
feels as if that characterization is obtuse. They love him and roll in his dung.

America's "top cop", Attorney General Eric Holder was held in contempt
of Congress in regard the Fast and Furious Scandal. Now he's facing
potential perjury charges on the AP/James Rosen - Fox News Scandal

IRS Division Chief Lois Learner "took the fifth" rather than lie before
Congress about her apparently criminal conduct in targeting the
president's political opponents under color of authority.

For her efforts, she was chosen to lead the ObamaCare division of IRS. We
expect that conservatives and libertarians will be dying off right and left.

UN Secretary Susan Rice lied about the causation for the Benghazi massacre
over-and-over-and-over again. For her efforts she has just been named
National Security Advisor to Barack Obama. What an honor...

It's not a secret that carnival workers nationwide are changing their nickname
from 'carney' to something else because they feel that Jay Carney is besmirching
their reputations for 'honesty'. As Press Secretary it's his job to lie for Obama
ever single day. In fact, if he's saying it, you know it's not true.

She's unattractive and uber masculine, but Michelle Obama opens her heart
to the American people. She says that she hates her life as First Lady and
just goes on yet one more vacation at taxpayers expense.

During his Second Inaugural Address and his State of the Union Speech, Obama promised to transform America into a European-style nanny state through a surge of liberal programs that would require more taxes and more spending.  I don't think that he was lying about that.

Rassmussen Polling shows that nearly 80% of conservatives feel that the Federal Government poses a 'clear and present' threat to their individual rights. And while we all understand that conservatives would feel that way, the overall number is 56%.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 56% of Likely U.S. Voters now consider the federal government a threat to individual rights rather than a protector of those rights. That’s up 10 points from 46% in December.
While the Obama Administration tells lie after lie and the mainstream media covers it up for him, the faith that many people have in regard who is the threat to us and our lives -- grows. 

DNA - A Law Enforcement Tool

In all US States, everyone who is arrested has been required to provide DNA by means of a mouth swab for many years. Some people are threatened by this (Ramirez cartoon above) but my opinion apparently differs from some conservatives. I'm not ALWAYS that conservative or so it seems. That may be because of my experience with DNA evidence as a tool of law enforcement, in the context of the Fourth Amendment.

When you're arrested and placed into a jail, you are subjected to a thorough search including a 'cavity search'. It's invasive, but necessary for the protection of both custodial officers and other inmates. Adding a DNA swab is far less invasive than that.

DNA evidence has become a powerful tool for law enforcement officers to hold the guilty accountable and also to dismiss charges against people who are not guilty. The sword swings both ways. News accounts are replete with examples of people doing time in prison, as it turns out wrongfully. The evidence used to convict is re-examined using DNA and they are released because they're innocent.

In Maryland v King, the US Supreme Court reaffirmed the right of the government to identify people through the use of a DNA sample, in much the same way as finger prints and photographs have been collected over the years.

MARYLAND v. KING
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
No. 12–207. Argued February 26, 2013—Decided June 3, 2013 After his 2009 arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, re-spondent King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland facility, where booking personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act). The swab was matched to an unsolved 2003 rape, and King was chargedwith that crime. He moved to suppress the DNA match, arguing that the Act violated the Fourth Amendment, but the Circuit Court Judgefound the law constitutional. King was convicted of rape. The Mary-land Court of Appeals set aside the conviction, finding unconstitutional the portions of the Act authorizing DNA collection from felony arrestees. 
Held: When officers make an arrest supported by probable cause to holdfor a serious offense and bring the suspect to the station to be detained in custody, taking and analyzing a cheek swab of the arrestee’s DNA is, like fingerprinting and photographing, a legitimate police booking procedure that is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.
Justice Kennedy wrote the Court's opinion (5-4 decision)   

Justice Scalia (arguably the most conservative member of the court) dissented and was joined in that dissent by the most liberal members of the court: Justice Ginsburg, Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan. They dissented along Fourth Amendment grounds and if you have any interest, you should follow the link (above) and read their reasoning.