sunset from behind the wire

sunset from behind the wire

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

BREXIT?

Fellow blogger, Jules, UK citizen, asked me to weigh in on whether or not Britain should leave the European Union. I have been reluctant to offer an opinion because I don't have a horse in that race.

However, since Barack flew there and took the opportunity to stress that the UK should remain in the EU, I feel that gives me the moral high ground (as a member of the "loyal opposition" to the ObamaNation).

Being a member of the EU undermines British sovereignty. Progressives in England argue that it's time to give up being British and hand their nationality to the European Union. The EU is forcing member nations to accept military age male Muslim refugees. Who would do that?

Those in favor of remaining in the EU argue that leaving the EU would risk the UK's prosperity, diminish its influence over world affairs, jeopardize national security by reducing access to common European criminal databases, and result in trade barriers between the UK and the EU. The argument against leaving is hollow, but they make it all the same. The SECSTATE John Kerrys of the world are out making commencement speeches about a world without borders. I don't know what drug they're taking but the unicorns and rainbows must be a sight to behold.

For the purpose of this blog post, I'll focus on the immigration issue. I can take on the others if anyone cares. There are a number of trade-related issues, but none of those eclipses the problem of Muslim refugees.
By the way, Islam is a religion, not a race. It's not racist to call refugee military age Muslim males, "savages".  That's how they behave, so that's what I choose to call them. 
Congratulations to Arch Bishop Welby for his efforts 
to bring more military age male Muslims to Britain.
Since it's illegal in Britain to criticize Islam or its adherents, I can be the voice of reason since I'm not in Britain. And if the British read this, it's not likely that I will ever be welcomed back despite the fact that while a serving American officer, I was seconded to the Royal Navy (62 Royal Marine Commando) and another unit for a time? My sense is that I would not.

Riddle me this??? What happens when a tolerant and inclusive culture welcomes a parasitic and intolerant culture? Ask the French, the Belgians. Ask the German women who are advised to scarf their heads by their government, in an effort to keep them from being attacked by military age Muslim savages.

The EU mandates that nations accept Muslim savages. I don't know how the EU can feel comfortable doing that, but apparently they do. Not everyone agrees. Outside of the EU, but still in Europe, the Norwegians deported a number of Muslims and the Swedes, who have many more savages in their country, are trying to figure a way to do the same and remain politically correct. Belgian and French people are voting out the pro-Muslim liberals and are installing far more conservative politicians. Will a modern day Charles Martel emerge? Not if the EU has a say in it.

Poles say no more Muslim refugees.
Seemingly unfazed by the recent European Commission proposal to punish countries which refuse to comply with "fair" refugee allocation quotas with fines as high as €250,000 per asylum seeker, the head of Poland’s ruling Law and Justice party and former PM Jaroslaw Kaczynski said that no refugees will be accepted in Poland "as they pose a threat to security" adding that Poland will oppose any law forcing EU members to pay €250,000 per refused refugee.

This makes an excellent case for BREXIT. Do the British people want to be dictated to like other EU members are for acting in their own self interest by denying access to savages?

16 comments:

  1. Obama commented that Great Britain would relegate itself behind the EU in trade with the US. I'm assuming he was saying that the EU would always get better deals because they have more buying power, and agreements with them would take precedence, etc. Let me be clear, this President does not understand how trade works.

    I think, if they stay in their quasi-union with the EU, they must drop the Great. Or change it, Okay Britain, or Alright Britain.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Barack doesn't do well with anything that requires an understanding of how things really work (outside of his narcissistic fantasy universe).

      So-So Britain? It might appeal to Asian immigrants more than Great (the R's create a problem)

      Delete
  2. I prefer 'Mediocre Britain,' it really rolls off the tongue, don't you agree, Race? I have to stop expending any more energy in worrying about foreign countries, and how they will deal with invasions by the Moors.

    As long as Mediocre Britain can still muster a competent fighting force when the U.S. needs an ally, I am OK with that force being manned by military age Moors. If they can point the rifle at the bad guys and pull the trigger, great.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Military age Moors -- great way of "putin" it. The problem with having barbarians in your military is that you are never sure who they consider to be the enemy (thinking of the iconic Major Nidal Hasan - and his 'workplace violence').

      Delete
    2. Yeah, LL, there's that. But that would be the Brits' issue, not ours. We typically do not integrate on the battle field with foreign units. They have their own fields of fire, we have ours. If a Major Nidal or two opens fire on their UK friendlies, it will only take a few bullets to put a stop to the wayward Moor, and then the mission will continue.

      And again, I can't be worrying about the purity of our allie's forces. If they are mildly polluted by Moors, and can still fight, I'm fine with that.

      Delete
    3. Sorry to be a "history wonk", but look what happened to the late Roman army -- it became a barbarian fighting force that ended up splitting the empire along tribal lines. Granted, they were Romanized savages, but still, a warning. Of course we don't have a problem with the Moors so much as with the trannies.

      Will a transsexual US military beat a Moorish army? I don't think there's a precedent for that.

      Delete
    4. I was thinking Moor of the entire brigade of military age Muslim males turning. It happened in India during the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857 when the mixture of military age Muslim males and the 'other units' (note that I'm keeping it very PC here) tilted precariously in favor of the Sepoys (300K Sepoys to 50K British soldiers). The Sikhs sent a number of regiments to help kill the mutineers.

      There is a lesson in this for armies who would incorporate Moors into their ranks in too large of numbers.

      Delete
    5. LSP, yes, and who can forget the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest (9 AD)? The loyal and trusted barbarians turned on the Romans.

      Soon, the trannys in the US military will rebel against wearing green because the color has very little fashion value. They'll wear bright pink and fuchsia as an expression of gender identity (a protected right or so Barack says). It will make them much easier for the enemy to kill - oh well.

      Delete
    6. Good T Forest point. And let's not forget the Mutiny. I recall canons played a part in deterring another episode...

      Delete
  3. The great European Secular Superstate (ESS) welcomes the Moorish savages because the Brussels Elite see them as a useful ally in deconstructing national sovereignty and the Western culture they hate and despise.

    Well, all fun and games until the shooting starts. Then there's Justsin Welby.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Brussels elites should be hung from lamp posts as a general message and the Moors herded aboard ships and dropped off in the land of the Moors.

      Delete
    2. There does seem to be a hint of lamp-postery in the air...

      Delete
  4. They never should have joined the EU to begin with. And now London has a Muslim Mayor. This is what will happen all over America if we continue to take in all these Muslim refugees. It already started with a Muslim congressman. When they outnumber us they will control (or attempt to) us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

      United States — Muslim 1.0%
      Australia — Muslim 1.5%
      Canada — Muslim 1.9%
      China — Muslim 1%-2%
      Italy — Muslim 1.5%
      Norway — Muslim 1.8%

      At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

      Denmark — Muslim 2%
      Germany — Muslim 3.7%
      United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
      Spain — Muslim 4%
      Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

      From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

      They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. (United States ).

      France — Muslim 8%
      Philippines — Muslim 5%
      Sweden — Muslim 5%
      Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
      The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
      Trinidad &Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

      At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

      When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris –car-burnings) . Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).

      Guyana — Muslim 10%
      India — Muslim 13.4%
      Israel — Muslim 16%
      Kenya — Muslim 10%
      Russia — Muslim 10-15%

      After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:


      Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

      At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

      Bosnia — Muslim 40%
      Chad — Muslim 53.1%
      Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

      From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

      Albania — Muslim 70%
      Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
      Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
      Sudan — Muslim 70%

      After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

      Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
      Egypt — Muslim 90%
      Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
      Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
      Iran — Muslim 98%
      Iraq — Muslim 97%
      Jordan — Muslim 92%
      Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
      Pakistan — Muslim 97%
      Palestine — Muslim 99%
      Syria — Muslim 90%
      Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
      Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
      United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

      100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

      Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
      Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
      Somalia — Muslim 100%
      Yemen — Muslim 99.9%

      Delete
  5. Sorry to be late to the party after I ASKED for this. I was busy in ISLAMorada.

    I think you make an excellent point quite in keeping with the right wing Brits. It's OK, Larry, you're invited back. Maybe you can reside at number 10?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you capture Florida and hoist the Union Jack, I think that you get to keep it.

      Delete

It's virtual - it's a mirage - it's life