sunset from behind the wire

sunset from behind the wire

Sunday, September 18, 2016

Idle Speculation (Sunday Sermonette)

Today I would like to discuss equality and the rule of law. Because it's Sunday, it's a sermonette.

Is the FBI investigating former Secretary of State and Army General Colin Powell for sending classified information through e-mail? Recent hacked e-mail of General Powell's indicates that he loathes Hillary Clinton and thinks that she's physically ill (nice of him to jump on the train). The e-mail also contains potentially classified information. Powell wrote in e-mail that Israel has 200 nuclear weapons pointed at Iran (in leaked 2015 email). If Powell had been a Clinton supporter, it's unlikely that he would be investigated based on what we've seen. But he's not loving them. Is he doomed as a result? We know that "all pigs are equal but some are more equal than others". The question remains whether Powell is more or less equal than candidate Hillary Clinton, who was exempted from criminal prosecution that would have been dealt out in large doses to a lesser (less equal) human.

The Religion of Peace seems to be at it again with two home-made IED's in the Chelsea District of New York City tonight. Hillary wants to bring half a million Muslim refugees to the US. She said it, and she stood by it. One wonders how women square candidate Clinton's stance on women with her policies in the Middle East and her courting of donations from dictators who oppress women. I'm sure if Hillary were to comment on this blog - and I have invited her via e-mail to that now infamous e-mail address - that she would duck the question and would say something on the order of, "money has a perfume all its own."

H/T Brig
Hillary Clinton supports disarming the American public (Constitution be damned). Donald Trump speculated that if her Secret Service detail disarmed that she wouldn't last long. The liberal media are howling, but is Trump correct?
Clinton advocate, Christi Paul, a CNN anchor said, “let’s say Joe Schmoe out in the audience said something like that. That would be seen, most likely, as a threat of some sort, and he would be hauled away."
A threat? To suggest that Hillary, who lives behind a tall fence surrounded by guards and dogs to have to fend for herself the way the common people do? I, your humble blogger, took it as more of a suggestion that they disarm. Call it an experiment. There are something on the order of 300 million firearms and several trillion rounds of ammunition in private hands in America. If patriots had wanted to start something, wouldn't they have done it before now? Still, the mere thought of those numbers send the progressive among us (progs) into fits of anxiety. There are eleven states that allow open carry of firearms now, and the damning statistics show that crime goes down where that happens. In cities with tough gun control (Chicago, Baltimore, etc.) crime is up.

In a Clinton universe, only the elite would have armed body guards, police and troops (also armed) at their beck and call. The public (children of a lesser God) would have to content themselves with sticks, stones and harsh language. Nothing in the Clinton doctrine calls on disarming criminals. But take heart, most of that honest and hard-working public is "deplorable". And we wouldn't want deplorable people to be able to defend themselves would we? Such would be the justification for unequal protection under the law in a Clinton Administration. Justice would be for sale to 'friends of the administration'...just the way that it is now.

We are all Despicable now. The Clinton Campaign's supporters are upset because the press isn't more firmly on the side of Crooked Hillary.
Gloria Steinem, the feminist leader and a Clinton supporter, said in an email that she had sensed a growing worry in recent weeks, fearing that Mr. Trump’s candidacy was becoming “legitimized by ‘media evenhandedness’” that had made his assorted scandals seem more banal.
My sense is that Steinem and other progs feel that the press shouldn't have aired the amateur films of Hillary entering her 'scooby van' while having a seizure. BUT some things are too juicy for the press to pass up. The "diagnosis" that the candidate had suffered from pneumonia was so ABSURD that nobody bought it except for the devoted progs and the press. So it goes. American progs are said to be renewing their passports in record numbers, vowing to leave the USA and never return if Donald Trump is elected president. We can only hope that they are good to their word. It would be decent of them to officially revoke their US citizenship. But will Mexico take them?

Undocumented guests/illegal aliens/wetbacks are said to be uneasy with the upcoming election as well, as they'd be forced to return to Mexico. Visa overstays (many of them Muslims) are concerned as well that they'd be forced to return to the fetid cities where they used to live. There has always been a pathway to legal immigration and citizenship, but the illegal aliens chose not to obey the law. Naturally, in a Clinton Administration, the law would be set aside provided that they voted for Democrats.

Bring in the Wookie! Yes, reports of the Clinton Campaign reaching out to Michelle Obama are confirmed.
(CNN - Clinton News Network) "With Hillary Clinton's lead in the polls over Donald Trump all but gone, her campaign is pushing prominent Democrats, including Michelle Obama, into the field in an effort to lock up the youth vote for the Democratic nominee."
I wonder who in the world cares what Michelle Obama says. Sure there is the band of insane progs who would roll in Barack's dung if given the chance. Hard core leftists and Afro-American activists are likely to vote for Hillary no matter what.
  • We know that Michelle hates living in the White House and equates it to "hell". (poor little rich girl)
  • We know that Michelle hated America until she became First Lady based on her own statements.
  • We know that Michelle loves to take lavish trips abroad as a "good will ambassador" at public expense.
But who cares what she thinks or says?

14 comments:

  1. "Nothing in the Clinton doctrine calls on disarming criminals." Disarming criminals doesn't work in the long run. They just go out and re-arm.

    What really works is 'discriminaling arms.' That is, permanently removing the criminal from the weapon. Capital punishment accomplishes this. Incarceration works well, if a life sentence is carried out faithfully.

    Or, just off-ing the perp at the scene is the most efficient (except for the paperwork).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Or, just off-ing the perp at the scene is the most efficient (except for the paperwork)"

      Task, tsk! Not that I disagree.

      Delete
    2. Well Seasoned: I know, not very Christian of me. But practical, however. And efficient. Just not very Christian.

      Delete
    3. The crusaders (Christians all) whacked a lot of "saracens".

      Delete
  2. Talk about BS stories, get this!
    Trump represented Clinton’s position on gun rights as wanting to “destroy your Second Amendment” and said that her bodyguards should no longer carry firearms in light of her policy stance, which includes expanded background checks for gun sales.

    “She doesn’t want guns, take theirs — let’s see what happens to her,” Trump said. “Take their guns away, okay? It’ll be very dangerous.”
    This sounds like something the idiots over at the Progressive Blog would say! LMAO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Clinton lies about absolutely everything. If she were to say, "the sky is blue," I'd worry and go out and check to see if it had turned green.

      Delete
  3. 1) I lost all respect for Colin Powell when he supported Obama merely because of race.
    2) The fastest recorded time in the universe is now the moment between an act of US terrorism and the leftist media publishing a statement that we have no idea of the motive behind the terrorism.
    3) Everyone but the offended left understood what Trump was saying. The unfortunate result is now the low information voters think that Trump really did incite people to violence.
    4) I'm proud to be a Deplorable American if it means we can throw off the shackles of progressivism that are destroying the very fabric of society.
    5) The Wookies took a vote and they don't want Michelle either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To Powell it's all about race. I will never forget when I was in DC, and there was a party, hosted by the Commanding General (Powell) and I was excluded because I was white. However, that's not "racism" as Powell and the progs would define it.

      The low information voters will vote for Hillary or Jill Stein or will write in a vote for Roseanne Barr (who isn't running for president on the communist ticket this election cycle).

      Delete
    2. At this point, I'd take Roseanne over Hillary. At least Ms. Barr's crass inhumanity is honest.

      Delete
    3. Yes, having Roseann do stand-up for Congress would be entertaining.

      Delete
  4. Gun control works! Total shot in Chicago to date (9/17) 3,104.

    Hillary doesn't have anything scheduled until the first debate - which she may, or may not, attend. Who the hell runs a campaign like that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She doesn't want to have a(nother) seizure in public. That would be totally career ending.

      The seizure at the 911 Memorial was a close run thing for her.

      She feels that once she's president, she doesn't have to leave the White House and can run the country from there, where epileptic fits, a little foaming at the mouth, etc. won't matter.

      Delete
  5. Look. Hillary may or may not be Satan's marionette, but if she is, the strings are beginning to snap.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poll numbers suggest that you're correct.

      Delete

It's virtual - it's a mirage - it's life