sunset from behind the wire

sunset from behind the wire

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Roots (Part 2): The Narcissistic Autocrat

Continued from ROOTS PART 1

Americans were shocked by President Obama's apparent misleading misrepresentations in Obamacare, were voters actually lied to or did they merely engage in profound self-deception?


Didn't Obama tell us who he was from the beginning? Is he really lying, from his vantage point? He is clearly a product of a socialist/Marxist background. He has vilified capitalism from the outset. He publicly stated that he favors a single-payer health-care system. Is he not fulfilling the total transformation of America as he promised from the outset? Who is lying to whom? Is Obama a palterer who talks deceitfully or is he merely engaging in Barry-speak? After all, if he never intended ObamaCare to be concerned with health care, he has been truthful all along since his end game is the destruction of the American health care system, to be replaced by a socialist system of his, and his mentor's design.

Given Obama's fragmented childhood, has the boy in him who had to protect himself from a loss of his father, a distant mother, and a confused identity, merely evolved into the man who uses protective language coloration to shield himself? Studies show that by five or six years of age, children become quite adept at lying. Could it be that in Obama's universe "not telling the truth is much more complex than just lying, because [one may ask] is there an absolute truth?" After all, this article at Salon manages to avoid the details of ObamaCare when it claims that "No, Obama didn't lie to you about your health care plan."

Then again, the New York Times maintains that Obama merely "misspoke." Commenting on this linguistic waffling, readers have stated that, "There are lies, there are damned lies, and there are 'incorrect promises.'"

What the hell is an 'incorrect promise'?


President Barack Obama has become a species of autocrat, who believes fully in implementing (Alinsky Tactics) -- that there is no lie in the advancement of his agenda is too egregious to tell.
(American Thinker) Barack Obama is a man with only one core conviction. He has, as the basic foundation of his otherwise disorganized and uncertain belief system, the irrefutable tenet that the United States, because of its European roots, has been the epitome of oppression and arrogance throughout its history. Therefore, he is able to rationalize the need to say or do anything as the transformation of American society and the end of the pre-eminent status of the United States are his sole objectives. He has, thus, adopted a pre-meditated schizophrenic personality wherein he comports himself as an apologist and appeaser on the international stage and a narcissistic autocrat at home.
Under the Obama Administration, the United States has become a running joke to much of the rest of the world. One can only surmise that their loathing is the desired result that the administration has been pushing (hard) for over the past five years.







11 comments:

  1. When the Devil in black speaks many heed his words, to Hell with that! Keep shooting... someone's bound to get a saving grace hit...

    ReplyDelete
  2. obama. That's about enough. I mean, damn . . .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wonder what he'll do after 2014 with both houses of Congress in control of the Republicans and the spectre of impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors looming?

      Delete
  3. I agree with the premise that Obama is working hard to bring down America. He has undermined the economy, health care, military and our standing among allies/enemies. Everything is going according to plan, though not quickly enough to please him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He has to wipe it/us out before the Democrats cave and the Republicans take back the legislature.

      Delete
  4. You and I agree 100%. I don't understand the "He lied" people. He is doing exactly what so many of us knew he would. I am a little surprised by Congress going along with it however. There is no longer a Democrat Party. It is now the Communist Party.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that they'd prefer the term National Socialist Worker's Party -- but that's just a guess on my part. It's a good thing that the Capitol has a sprinkler/fire fighting system or the narcissist would have somebody start a Reichstag style fire so that he could blame the Tea Party...

      Delete
  5. His speech yesterday about focusing on income inequality was downright scary. He speaks nothing of creating wealth, only taking and limiting it...

    ReplyDelete
  6. I blog often and I genuinely appreciate your content.

    This article has really peaked my interest.

    I'm going to book mark your blog and keep checking for new information
    about once a week. I subscribed to your RSS feed too.


    Feel free to surf to my web blog; new overstock coupon codes

    ReplyDelete

It's virtual - it's a mirage - it's life